West Papua Update

It's fast, it's accurate, it's online

Archive for the month “April, 2011”

The Role of the UN Secretary-General’s Representative in Resolving the Dispute over West Papua

The UN Secretary-General’s Representative, Ambassador Fernando Ortiz-Sanz ,acknowledged early on that he “. . .was not given any political or administrative authority, not even a supervisory function”. Rather, his role was to “advise, assist and participate in arrangements which are the responsibility of Indonesia for the act of free choice, having in mind the interests and welfare of the people of the territory”. (Article XVII and the preamble. UN doc. A17723, 1969, p. 4.) “Advice” was meant “to express views, offer counsel, make recommendations and suggest ap¬propriate measures to the Government, having in mind the existing prin¬ciples of the Agreement”. (Article XVII and the preamble. UN doc. A17723, 1969, p. 4.). This was to be done through the modality of consultations with the representative councils on procedures and appro¬priate methods to ascertain the will of the people; the formulation of ques¬tions in such a way as to permit the inhabitants to decide whether they wish to remain or sever their ties with Indonesia; and the preparation of a list of persons eligible to participate in the act of free choice. Read more…

Act of Free Choice

The New York Agreement: Legal Basis to Restore West Papua Into the Republic of Indonesia (Part 4)

From those statements, it is apparent that the United Nations from the outset had a clear understanding that West Papua was a bilateral matter concerning an unresolved issue of decolonization in the territory of the Indonesian Republic. More precisely, the United Nations was aware that the whole process was an effort on behalf of Indonesia to facilitate the exercise of its full control and sovereignty over the last part of what was once the Netherlands East-Indies. Read more…

The New York Agreement: Legal Basis to Restore West Papua Into the Republic of Indonesia (Part 3)

The Agreement was of supreme national importance to Indonesia from the viewpoint of building its nation and national reconstruction which at the time was still in a period of growth and consolidation. Towards this end, the Agreement was a valuable contribution for it succeeded in bringing about a better level of understanding between Indonesia and the Netherlands as well as demonstrating in the early years of the United Nations its success in bringing about a settlement between two of its member States. (1127th  meeting of the General Assembly plenary  session of 21 September 1962) Read more…

Revisiting History and the Special Autonomy for Papua

Wednesday, 30 March 2011

by Agus Sumule
Introduction

First of all, I would like to thank the symposium organizer for inviting me to speak in this special occasion.  Indeed the issue of the political history of Papua is an important one, which requires proper attention of the concerned and related parties.  I hope that what I am about to share this afternoon would positively contribute to the current debate on the issue, but most importantly would allow the people of Papua to continue exercising their rights within the context of the Law No. 21 of the year 2001 on the Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua for their own dignity and prosperity.  Read more…

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,086 other followers